Here is the story most parents reach for when one child races ahead and the other stalls. The two of them simply learn in different styles, so each one needs to be taught their own way. It is a comforting idea. It is also one researchers have tested, and set aside.
If that is your house, you have already run an experiment without meaning to. Same home, same teaching, two different results. Your struggling child is not broken, and you did nothing wrong. Their brain is processing one kind of information differently, and the sibling beside them is the clearest proof of it.
That contrast is not a problem to explain away. It is useful. It rules out the things parents blame themselves for. And it points straight at what actually differs: which specific skills are further along in one child than the other.
TL;DR
- When siblings get the same teaching and one thrives while the other struggles, the difference is how each brain processes specific information, not effort, parenting, or intelligence.
- That built-in comparison is useful. It clears away the home and the teaching as the cause, and points to the exact skills that are further along in one child than the other.
- The move is to build the specific underbuilt skill in the struggling child, not to match a learning style. Researchers tested that idea and set it aside.
The sibling sitting beside your struggling child is not the competition. They are the closest thing to a control group you will ever get.
“– Laura Lurns
What the Comparison Actually Shows You
Put two children side by side, and the gap is the thing that jumps out. The more useful question is quieter. What is the easy reader doing that the other has not built yet? Reading alone leans on several systems at once. Hearing the separate sounds in a word. Tracking a line across a page. Holding the start of a sentence in mind while the end arrives. A child is often strong in most of these, with one area further behind. Even one skill that lags adds drag to the whole job. The International Dyslexia Association updated its definition of reading difficulty in 2025. It says the difficulties behind reading are common but not universal, and the causes are genetic, neurobiological and environmental influences acting together. That is why a sibling who sails through tells you so much. It shows the home and the teaching were never the cause. That frees you to look at where the skills themselves differ. Sometimes more than one area feels tangled, like reading and focus, or writing and attention. In that case, a short set of questions about what you notice at home is a calmer place to start than a label.
Why ‘They Each Learn Differently’ Leads Parents Astray
Here is where a good instinct takes a wrong turn. Once you watch two children learn at different speeds, it feels right to teach each one in their own style. More pictures for this child, more movement for that one. Researchers have checked this idea head on. A 2008 review found almost no evidence that matching teaching to a child’s preferred style helps them learn. A 2024 analysis judged any benefit far too small and too rare to build a plan around. A 2020 survey across 18 countries found nearly 9 in 10 teachers still believe in it anyway. So the problem was never that your children need matching styles. The problem is that one of them has a specific skill that is not built yet. The fix is not a different style. It is teaching that skill directly, in the right order, starting with the one holding the most back. A plain-language summary of how reading actually develops shows why the order you teach in matters more than the style you teach in.

When a parent tells me one child flew and the other is stuck, I lean in. That pair is the most honest assessment I will get. It shows the teaching already worked once, under this roof, with this parent. So I stop asking what is wrong with the struggling child. I start asking which skill is further back. Build that one, in the right order, and the child who looked so different from their sibling starts to look a lot more like them.
Key Takeaways
A sibling who learns easily is not a benchmark your struggling child is failing to meet. They are evidence that the home and the teaching were never the cause.
Reading leans on several skills at once. Even one that is further behind is enough to make the whole job feel hard, in a bright and hardworking child.
Matching teaching to a child’s ‘style’ did not hold up when researchers checked it in 2008 and again in 2024. Teaching the missing skill directly, in order, is what moves a child forward.
You are not raising one easy child and one hard child. You are raising two different children, and only one of them needs you to find the missing piece.
“– Laura Lurns
What to Do With the Struggling One
Start by dropping the comparison out loud. Your struggling child already feels the gap, and naming it rarely helps. What helps is deciding that the difference is information, not a verdict. Here is the part the system keeps getting wrong. It is quick to hang a label on a child, and slow to tell you what to do on Tuesday afternoon. A label names where your child is. It does not build the skill that is behind. Nobody will ever advocate for your child as hard as you will, and that is exactly why the next step is yours to take. When reading is hard, we look at more than reading. The sounds, the page, holding words in mind. Our assessment asks about all of them. The plan that comes back is built around the one child in front of you, not an average, and not their sibling. Answer a few questions about what you already notice at home, and get a plan that starts with the one skill holding your child back, at Learning Success.
Common questions from parents
Does a struggling child mean I failed the other one somehow?
Should I teach each of my children in their own learning style?
My struggling child is clearly bright. Could they simply be lazy or not trying?
Should I get my struggling child evaluated?



