What the Science of Reading Means for Your Child
We hold no definition of the phrase science of reading. In our view, it is best read as research on how children learn to read. It is not one program. A federal guide rated two classroom practices strongest (Foorman and colleagues, 2016). One links speech sounds to letters. The other is sounding out words. The guide covers grades K–3.
TL;DR
- We hold no definition of the phrase science of reading. In our view, it is best read as research on how children learn to read. In our view, it also covers the teaching built on it. It is not one program.
- A federal guide on teaching reading gave its strongest rating to two things (Foorman and colleagues, 2016). One is teaching children to hear the sounds in words and link them to letters. The other is teaching them to sound out, spell and recognize words. The guide is for classroom teaching from kindergarten to third grade. It left out studies where most children had an identified disability.
- A national panel compared systematic phonics with other ways of teaching reading (National Reading Panel, 2000). Children taught phonics in a planned order did better than each kind of comparison group. One researcher argues the phonics evidence is weaker than claimed (Bowers, 2020). Others reply that it backs direct phonics teaching within a full approach (Fletcher, Savage and Vaughn, 2021). Both sides agree children need to learn how letters link to sounds.
- This page gives home steps for reading practice. The way we put these steps together is our own practice. We hold no home study that names these steps.
- To learn how your child's school teaches reading, ask the teacher. Ask how letter sounds are taught, and in what order. These questions are our own, not a tested method.
What does "science of reading" mean?
You may hear the phrase science of reading at school or online.
We hold no definition of the phrase science of reading. In our view, it is best read as research on how children learn to read. In our view, it also covers the teaching built on it. It is not one program.
What the research we hold says, and where it stops
The federal guide. A federal guide on teaching reading gave its strongest rating to two things (Foorman and colleagues, 2016). One is teaching children to hear the sounds in words and link them to letters. The other is teaching them to sound out, spell and recognize words. The guide rated daily reading of real text, with feedback, as moderate. The guide also advises against teaching children to guess words from pictures or first letters.
In the guide, strong means several good studies leave little doubt. Moderate means good studies, but less sure the results hold in general.
The guide is for classroom teaching from kindergarten to third grade. It left out studies where most children had an identified disability. Its studies of sounding out words were all in schools. The guide says it might also apply to older students who need reading help. The guide builds on a national panel's report from 2000. It says newer studies back up the panel's findings.
The national panel. A national panel compared systematic phonics with other ways of teaching reading (National Reading Panel, 2000). Children taught phonics in a planned order did better than each kind of comparison group.
The debate. One researcher argues the phonics evidence is weaker than claimed (Bowers, 2020). We read his paper's summary and an early version of the paper. Others reply that the phonics evidence backs direct phonics teaching within a full approach (Fletcher, Savage and Vaughn, 2021). Both sides agree children need to learn how letters link to sounds. We do not pick a winner in this debate.
Structured literacy. The International Dyslexia Association uses the term structured literacy. It means teaching the sounds and spelling of the language directly, in a planned order. The association calls it an approach, not a program. It is the association's working definition, and the association takes a side in this debate.
Nothing in the studies on this page tested a Learning Success program.
Home. The federal guide had just one study where parents gave the teaching. That study is not evidence for any one home method.
Reading practice at home
In our view, home practice should match what your child is being taught. Here are some ideas.
- Play with sounds by ear. Say a short word, like cat. Ask your child to say each sound in it.
- Link the sounds to letters. Write the letters as your child says each sound. Then read the word together.
- Let your child read to you. Pick a short book your child can mostly read. Listen.
- Point back to the sounds. When your child misreads a word, point back to the sounds. Do not just say the word.
- Match the teaching. Find out which letter sounds your child is learning now. Practice those.
Some of our steps borrow from the guide's classroom advice. In our view, they also suit home practice.
This list is our own practice, not a tested method.
Do these at home alongside your child's reading teaching, not in place of it.
How to tell how your child's school teaches reading
We cannot tell you what your child's school does. Only the school can. In our view, the simplest way to find out is to ask the teacher.
Here are some questions you could ask.
- How are letter sounds taught, and in what order?
- When my child is stuck on a word, what are they taught to do?
- How do you check how my child is doing with sounding out words?
- What extra help is there if my child struggles?
- What could we practice at home to match the class?
These questions are our own, not a tested method.
You are not testing anyone. You are finding out what the teaching is. To us, these are fair questions a school can answer.
Where to go next
Our page on balanced and structured literacy covers both terms. Our page on phonics activities has more home ideas. So does our page on phonemic awareness activities. Does your child guess at words? See our page on a child who guesses at words. If you wonder about dyslexia, see our page on dyslexia or an instruction gap. Our page on reading programs explained covers programs.
When to ask for help
Each of these is a reason to ask for help on its own.
- Little change, even with steady practice and good teaching.
- Reading well below what school expects.
- A teacher who raises a concern about reading.
- Extreme upset about reading.
- Complete avoidance of reading.
- Hopelessness about learning.
- Sadness or worry that lasts.
- Significant delays in speech, language or motor development.
- A skill that was there and has gone. Our position is that a lost skill goes to a doctor first, not a tutor.
Start with the teacher. Say what you are seeing at home, and what you have tried. Beyond the teacher, the right person depends on what it turns out to be about. If the work is too hard, someone who works on that school skill. If worry or mood is the thing, someone who works with children's mental health. In our view, delays in speech, language or movement are worth raising with your child's doctor. In our view, if you are worried enough to ask, a professional evaluation is worth asking about.
Any talk of hurting themselves is a same-day call to your doctor or a crisis line.
In the classroom
A family may ask if your class uses the science of reading. Describe what you do, in plain words.
Two sentences for an email home: "You asked how we teach reading. Here is how we teach letter sounds, and in what order."
Key Takeaways
We hold no definition of the phrase science of reading. In our view, it is best read as research on how children learn to read. In our view, it also covers the teaching built on it. It is not one program.
A federal guide on teaching reading gave its strongest rating to two things (Foorman and colleagues, 2016). One is teaching children to hear the sounds in words and link them to letters. The other is teaching them to sound out, spell and recognize words. The guide is for classroom teaching from kindergarten to third grade. It left out studies where most children had an identified disability.
One researcher argues the phonics evidence is weaker than claimed (Bowers, 2020). Others reply that it backs direct phonics teaching within a full approach (Fletcher, Savage and Vaughn, 2021). Both sides agree children need to learn how letters link to sounds.
This page gives home steps for reading practice. The way we put these steps together is our own practice. We hold no home study that names these steps.
Tonight, write down two questions for your child's teacher. Ask how letter sounds are taught, and in what order. Ask what your child is taught to do when stuck on a word. You are not testing anyone. You are finding out what the teaching is.
”What to do tonightWhat to use next
A set of questions you answer about what you see at home. A screener is a starting point, not a diagnosis. If your child might need formal accommodations (an IEP or 504 plan), or you suspect a vision, hearing, or medical cause, pursue a professional evaluation too — that's the only route to those supports.
A short reading and spelling practice. Each word appears letter by letter. The picture comes only once the word is complete. So guessing from the image is not available. It includes writing words from memory. That practices the spelling and the writing of a word at the same time.
Common questions from parents
Is the science of reading a program?
In our view, no. We hold no definition of the phrase science of reading. In our view, it is best read as research on how children learn to read. In our view, it also covers the teaching built on it. It is not one program.
Is structured literacy the same thing?
In our view, the two terms overlap but are not the same. The International Dyslexia Association uses the term structured literacy. It means teaching the sounds and spelling of the language directly, in a planned order. The association calls it an approach, not a program. It is the association's working definition. The association takes a side in the reading debate. The association calls its approach evidence-based. The association is not a neutral voice.
Does my child's school use the science of reading?
We cannot tell you. Only your child's school can. Ask the teacher how letter sounds are taught, and in what order. Ask what your child is taught to do when stuck on a word. These questions are our own, not a tested method.
Can I use the science of reading at home?
The federal reading guide (Foorman and colleagues, 2016) had just one study where parents gave the teaching. That study is not evidence for any one home method. In our view, short sound and letter games can sit beside reading teaching. The way we run these games is our own practice. Do these at home alongside your child's reading teaching, not in place of it.